• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
Bailey Kennedy Attorneys at Law

Bailey Kennedy Attorneys at Law

  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    • Litigation
    • Appellate Advocacy
    • Hospital and Healthcare Law
    • Business and Corporate Law
    • Real Estate
    • Administrative and Gaming Law
    • Ethics and Professional Responsibility Law
  • Attorneys
    • John R. Bailey
    • Tayler D. Bingham
    • Rebecca L. Crooker
    • Joshua M. Dickey
    • Scott A. Eaton
    • Joshua P. Gilmore
    • Mark H. Goldstein
    • Sarah E. Harmon
    • Dennis L. Kennedy
    • Joseph A. Liebman
    • Paul C. Williams
  • News & Media
    • Articles
    • Press Releases
    • Community
  • Careers
  • Testimonials
  • About Us
  • Diversity Statement
  • Contact

New Notice Requirement for Subpoenas Duces Tecum

Bailey Kennedy · August 6, 2019

By Sarah E. Harmon
By Sarah E. Harmon

As a result of the March 1, 2019 amendments to the Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure, there is now an additional step that litigants must take before they can subpoena a witness in Nevada.  Under NRCP 45(a)(4), if you wish to subpoena a witness in order to obtain documents, electronically stored information (such as emails, metadata, Excel spreadsheets, and the like), other tangible or physical objects, or even the right to inspect the premises at issue in the litigation, then you must now provide advance notice to all other parties of your intent before serving the subpoena on the witness.  Specifically, you must serve all other parties in the action with a notice and a copy of the subpoena at least seven (7) days before service of the subpoena on the witness.  The seven-day notice period is designed to permit each party time to make objections to the subpoena and time to seek issuance of a protective order, where necessary.

The new notice requirement does not alleviate the need to provide the witness with his or her own time period in which to lodge any objections to the subpoena.  NRCP 45(c)(2)(B) still provides that the witness may lodge his or her own objection to the subpoena before the time specified for compliance in the subpoena, or within 14 days of service of the subpoena, whichever is earlier.  Keep in mind that the court can quash or modify a subpoena if it fails to provide reasonable time for compliance.  Thus, it is best practice to provide the witness with at least seven (7) to fourteen (14) days to comply with subpoena, although a longer period of time may be required for subpoenas requesting production of a large quantity of documents or documents containing a significant amount of privileged or confidential information.  Therefore, if you are thinking about serving a subpoena for the production of documents, you will need to plan accordingly and make sure to serve your notice of the subpoena at least fourteen (14) to twenty-one (21) days before the compliance deadline in the subpoena, if not earlier.

This notice requirement is not required for subpoenas commanding the appearance of the witness for a deposition, hearing, or trial.  However, it likely will be applied to subpoenas duces tecum served on Nevada residents for actions outside of Nevada.

If you have any questions about appeals, please call or email Sarah Harmon at 702-562-8820 or SHarmon@BaileyKennedy.com. Additional resources can also be found at www.baileykennedy.com/category/articles/ or www.linkedin.com/in/sarahharmonbk.

Disclaimer

The information provided in this article does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice.  All information, content, and materials available in this article are for general informational purposes only.  The information in this article may not constitute the most up-to-date legal information.  Any links to third-party websites included in this article are only made for the convenience of the reader, and the author of this article does not recommend or endorse the contents of the third-party sites.

Readers of this article should contact their attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular legal matter.  No reader of this article should act or refrain from acting on the basis of information in this article without first seeking legal advice from counsel in the relevant jurisdiction.  Only your individual attorney can provide assurances that the information contained herein — and your interpretation of it — is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation.  Use of, and access to, this article, or any of the links or resources contained herein do not create an attorney-client relationship between the reader and author.

All liability with respect to actions taken or not taken based on the contents of this article are hereby expressly disclaimed.  The content of this article is provided “as is;” no representations are made that the content is error-free.

© 2023

BaileyKennedy.com
PLEASE NOTE: If you are not a current client of Bailey Kennedy, do not transmit any confidential information to us. An e-mail communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Any information sent to us before an attorney-client relationship is established will not be treated as confidential, and we may use such information against you if we represent another party in the matter. An attorney-client relationship with Bailey Kennedy can be established only after (i) we perform a conflict check, and (ii) a written engagement letter is signed by us and the client. If you do not have a signed engagement letter, do not send us any confidential information.